Correspondent banking de-risking: the African bank response

Correspondent banking de-risking is the slow-burn structural threat to African finance that does not get the headlines it should. Global banks have been shedding nostro relationships with African counterparts at a steady rate since 2014, and the 2024 BIS data confirms the trajectory has not reversed. For a Tier 2 or Tier 3 African bank, losing your last USD correspondent is an existential event: trade finance settlement stops, remittance corridors close, and customer balances become trapped.

The risk most banks have not written down

What we observe across African banking clients is consistent: most institutions carry a correspondent banking risk that never makes it onto the enterprise risk register. The treasurer knows the relationship is fragile. The risk officer has not formally documented it. The board has not been asked to approve a contingency plan. The exposure is real, but it is invisible to the people accountable for it.

Single-correspondent dependency versus a resilient, redundant correspondent network — Single-correspondent dependency is the highest-rated risk in this category.

Three responses, run in parallel

Three responses are realistic, and African banks need to pursue all three at once rather than in sequence.

Three responses African banks must run in parallel to manage de-risking — Lower the cost of compliance, remove single-counterparty dependency, and build optionality on new rails.

Make the relationship demonstrably low-risk. Correspondent banks are not closing relationships because they want to. They close them because the cost of compliance per relationship exceeds the revenue. The single most effective lever is an annual independent AML/CFT effectiveness review delivered in a format that maps directly to the Wolfsberg Correspondent Banking Due Diligence Questionnaire. This is not a CBDDQ submission. It is a third-party-validated capability document that sits behind the CBDDQ and answers the questions the correspondent's compliance team actually asks.
Build redundancy. Single-correspondent dependency is the highest-rated risk in this category. Most African banks we have worked with have one tier-1 USD correspondent, one EUR, one GBP. A six-month deliberate effort to add a second correspondent in at least one currency, typically a regional Pan-African or Middle Eastern institution, materially reduces tail risk.
Engage with regional settlement initiatives. PAPSS (the Pan-African Payment and Settlement System) and BIS Project Agora are no longer experimental. They are settling real volume. African banks that move early on these rails hold an option value that banks waiting for them to mature do not.

None of these three is a one-quarter fix. All three need a board-approved correspondent banking resilience plan with measurable milestones.

Where ARMA comes in

ARMA's correspondent banking resilience engagement is an 8 to 12 week diagnostic and capability build that delivers a CBDDQ-mapped independent AML/CFT effectiveness review, a redundancy roadmap with two prioritised target correspondents, and a PAPSS and CBDC readiness assessment. It is built for Tier 2 and Tier 3 African banks where USD or EUR settlement depends on three or fewer counterparties. Visit client.africarisk.net to scope the engagement.

Working capital optimisation via supply chain finance [2021]

Originally published April 2021, republished here as part of ARMA's continuity record. The working capital pressures the original piece described in the COVID-era have settled into a permanent feature of African corporate balance sheets. Supply chain finance (SCF) emerged from the 2008-09 global financial crisis as

Why credit providers need to keep raising their credit skills [2018]

Originally published April 2018, republished here as part of ARMA's continuity record. The argument has only become more urgent. A few years ago, ARMA worked with FSD Africa and IPC GmbH on a continent-wide credit-skills assessment. The headline finding was simple and uncomfortable: most African credit

AfCFTA: the trade opportunity ARMA was set up to serve

Originally published April 2021, republished here as part of ARMA's continuity record. The opportunity it describes has only sharpened in the five years since. When African leaders came together to sign the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) agreement in Kigali in 2018, the continent was engulfed in

Why ERM is no longer optional for African boards

When the Central Bank of Kenya introduced climate risk disclosure requirements in 2024, many commercial banks discovered a troubling reality: their Enterprise Risk Management frameworks, despite appearing comprehensive on paper, could not answer basic questions about portfolio exposure to drought risk or temperature impacts on agricultural lending. That was not